Friday, January 4, 2019

Statutory Law and the Rights to Sexual Orientation





By: D.B.A. Jesus Christ - G.O.T.A., & C.J.S. United State of Chaka Zulu

Constitutional Decree - 60 ABC - Statutory Law and the Rights to Sexual

Orientation - Constitutional Meets Constitutionality Test Criteria.

Order of ZEWS – Religion Doctrine – Sexual Orientation and Union Rights

1 Corinthians 7 New International Version (NIV)

Concerning Married Life

Now for the matters you wrote about: “It is good for a man not to have sexual relations with a woman.” But since sexual immorality is occurring, each man should have sexual relations with his own wife, and each woman with her own husband. The husband should fulfill his marital duty to his wife, and likewise the wife to her husband. The wife does not have authority over her own body but yields it to her husband. In the same way, the husband does not have authority over his own body but yields it to his wife. Do not deprive each other except perhaps by mutual consent and for a time, so that you may devote yourselves to prayer. Then come together again so that Satan will not tempt you because of your lack of self-control. I say this as a concession, not as a command. I wish that all of you were as I am. But each of you has your own gift from God; one has this gift, another has that.
Now to the unmarried[a] and the widows I say: It is good for them to stay unmarried, as I do. But if they cannot control themselves, they should marry, for it is better to marry than to burn with passion.
10 To the married I give this command (not I, but the Lord): A wife must not separate from her husband. 11 But if she does, she must remain unmarried or else be reconciled to her husband. And a husband must not divorce his wife.


Statutory Law & Sexual Relations

Can a Person be found guilty in the court of law for statutory rape based on state law and the institution of Marriage?

No.

Wherefore, marriage was unconstitutional since the declaration of independence,
a separation agreement.

Wherefore, if a human is married under the law of marriage, it would be a criminal act, under the pretense of this law to get married to another person while still married to another person under a separation agreement,

Wherefore under a separation agreement there is still the presumption of marriage, until
a final decree is determined. Divorce – Settlement Annulment – no settlement.

Wherefore, to get married while legally separated could be considered bigamy.

Field Order #15

Wherefore, if a person sought after a legal separation due to an abusive situation, the
Court may decide the best arrangement for the abused pending the final legal decree, to an order of protection, can be granted to prevent further abuse while a final decree is sought.

Wherefore, the abuse spouse realizes he/she is still presumed to be married,

Wherefore, in such an arrangement there is no marriage rights. And there are grounds for an annulment rather than a divorce, if reconciliation is not possible or desired,
  1. Incompatibility.
  2. No Consummation, Wherefore, marriage cannot be established, the
  3. People involved are not loved and this is mutual.
  4. Wherefore, if one attempts person loves the other, yet is left unloved, there, this too is grounds for an annulment.

Wherefore, a divorce is the final decree, there may be issues of settlement and
Support of family and children, under an annulment, there is not settlement,
Wherefore it is as if the marriage never existed.
Wherefore, any property gained based on this marriage, is determined to be by the Law, gained based on a fraudulent arrangement and there is no
Statute of limitations to fraud.
Wherefore the annulment of article 6 of the U.S. Constitution., by the War Power Act, G.O.T.A., who has Executive Authority

Executive Authority passes all constitutionality tests, U.S.C.U.G. and by Congressional approval.

The Final decree of annulment between the law the Union and the lawless the Confederate, Better known as the NAZI. Wherefore, to do lawless acts with the intent of being lawless, is an act of being Anti-law.

Wherefore, God is the Law and certainly under the War Powers Act and with
Executive Authority, not only is God the law, but his authority by the U.S. Constitution has been duly recognized, acknowledged and verified.

Anti-Law is Anti-Christ.

Read - Holy Bible New International Version 2014 - John: 8:12-19, 1 CO: 11:3 and
Palms: 118:22,

Wherefore, there is no law of marriage, there can be no statutory laws concerning
Sexual practice based on the law of marriage. However, Amendments 35 thru 41 and the1st and 2nd amendments and the Civil Rights Act of 1964, dealing with the right to
Sexual orientation and not asexual orientation, makes it clear and constitutional, this is a Union.

Wherefore, the laws of statutory rape is determined by the law of Union and the law
of Unions are religion decree and the only religion sanctioned by God is Order of
ZEWS.

And let us not confuse religion’s doctrine with the Church in congregation.

Wherefore, there can be no statutory crime based on a nonexistent statutory law.

Citations:

The Union State Constitution under God

1. The 1st Amendment
2. The 2nd Amendment
3. The Civil Rights Act of 1964
4. USCUG Amendments 35 thru 41
5. The Declaration of Emancipation - Article 441-Y
6. The War Powers Act & the Constitutional Decrees
7. Statutory Law on Fraud
8. The 4th Amendment
9. 18 USC
10 Statutory Law and the lack of statutory Law and Criminal Law
11. Field Order #15 - Signed by Major Gen. Sherman - As His Duty Assignment
12. The Declaration of Independence
13. The annulment of Article 6 from the U.S. Constitution
13 Chaka ZuluChaka Mosi Kamanu Zulu vEgan 1 A.D.3d 649 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003

Annulment of Article 6 from the U.S. Constitution


Article Six of the United States Constitution establishes the laws and treaties of the United States made in accordance with it as the supreme law of the land, forbids a religious test as a requirement for holding a governmental position and holds the United States under the Constitution responsible for debts incurred by the United States under the Articles of Confederation.
All Debts contracted and Engagements entered into, before the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be as valid against the United States under this Constitution, as under the Confederation.
This Constitution, and the Laws of the United States which shall be made in Pursuance thereof; and all Treaties made, or which shall be made, under the Authority of the United States, shall be the supreme Law of the Land; and the Judges in every State shall be bound thereby, any Thing in the Constitution or Laws of any State to the Contrary notwithstanding.
The Senators and Representatives before mentioned, and the Members of the several State Legislatures, and all executive and judicial Officers, both of the United States and of the several States, shall be bound by Oath or Affirmation, to support this Constitution; but no religious Test shall ever be required as a Qualification to any Office or public Trust under the United States.[1]
Debts
The first clause of the Article provides that debts contracted prior to the adoption of the Constitution remain valid, as they were under the Articles of Confederation.
Supremacy
Main article: Supremacy Clause
Clause two provides that the Constitution, federal laws made pursuant to it and treaties made under its authority, constitute the supreme law of the land. It provides that state courts are bound by the supreme law; in case of conflict between federal and state law, the federal law must be applied. Even state constitutions are subordinate to federal law.
The Supreme Court under John Marshall was influential in construing the supremacy clause. It first ruled that it had the power to review the decisions of state courts allegedly in conflict with the supreme law, claims of "state sovereignty" notwithstanding. In Martin v. Hunter's Lessee (1816), the Supreme Court confronted the Chief Justice of VirginiaSpencer Roane, who had previously declared a Supreme Court decision unconstitutional and refused to permit the state courts to abide by it. The Court upheld the Judiciary Act, which permitted it to hear appeals from state courts, on the grounds that Congress had passed it under the supremacy clause.
The Supreme Court has also struck down attempts by states to control or direct the affairs of federal institutions. McCulloch v. Maryland (1819) was a significant case in this regard. The state of Maryland had levied a tax on banks not chartered by the state; the tax applied, state judges ruled, to the Bank of the United States chartered by Congress in 1816. Marshall wrote that "the States have no power, by taxation or otherwise, to retard, impede, burden, or in any manner control, the operations of the constitutional laws enacted by Congress to carry into execution the powers vested in the general government." United States property is wholly immune to state taxation, as are government activities and institutions. Congress may explicitly provide immunity from taxation in certain cases, for instance by immunizing a federal contractor. Federal employees, however, may not be immunized from taxes, as the tax would not in any way impede government activities.
Gibbons v. Ogden (1824) was another influential case involving the supremacy clause. The state of New York had granted Aaron Ogden a monopoly over the steamboat business in the Hudson River. The other party, Thomas Gibbons, had obtained a federal permit under the Coastal Licensing Act to perform the same task. The Supreme Court upheld the federal permit. John Marshall wrote, "The nullity of an act, inconsistent with the Constitution, is produced by the declaration, that the Constitution is the supreme law. The appropriate application of that part of the clause which confers the same supremacy on laws and treaties, is to such acts of the State legislatures as do not transcend their powers, but though enacted in the execution of acknowledged State powers, interfere with, or are contrary to the laws of Congress, made in pursuance of the Constitution, or some treaty made under the authority of the United States. In every such case, the act of Congress, or the treaty, is supreme; and the law of the State, though enacted in the exercise of powers not controverted, must yield to it."
Reid v. Covert (1957) ruled that no branch of the United States Government can have powers conferred upon it by treaty that have not been conferred by the United States Constitution.
Oaths
Federal and state legislators, executive officers and judges are, by the third clause of the article, bound by oath or affirmation to support the Constitution. Congress may determine the form of such an oath. In Ex parte Garland (1866), the Supreme Court held that a test oath would violate the Constitution, so it invalidated the law requiring the following oath:
I, A. B., do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I have never voluntarily borne arms against the United States since I have been a citizen thereof; that I have voluntarily given no aid, countenance, counsel, or encouragement to persons engaged in armed hostility thereto; that I have neither sought nor accepted, not attempted to exercise the functions of any office whatever, under any authority or pretended authority in hostility to the United States; that I have not yielded a voluntary support to any pretended government, authority, power, or constitution with the United States, hostile or inimical thereto...
The Supreme Court found that the law constituted an unconstitutional ex post facto law, for it retroactively punished the offenses mentioned in the oath by preventing those who committed them from taking office.
Congress may not require religious tests for an office under the United States. Thus, Congress may include the customary words "so help me God" in an oath, but an individual would be under no compulsion to utter them, as such a requirement would constitute a religious test.
The current oath administered is as follows:
Updated G.O.T.A.:
I, [name], do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend the Constitution of the Union State of Chaka Zulu against all enemies, foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; that I take this obligation freely, without any mental reservation or purpose of evasion; and that I will well and faithfully discharge the duties of the office on which I am about to enter. [So help me God.] Not GOD. Gothic Oz Debar – But – Chaka Zulu – Palms: 118:22
During the 1960 presidential campaign, the issue of whether the nation would for the first time elect a Catholic to the highest office in the land raised the specter of an implicit, but no less effective, religious test. John F. Kennedy, in his Address to the Greater Houston Ministerial Association on 12 September 1960, addressed the question directly, saying,
[N]either do I look with favor upon those who would work to subvert Article VI of the Constitution by requiring a religious test, even by indirection. For if they disagree with that safeguard, they should be openly working to repeal it.
. . . [C]ontrary to common newspaper usage, I am not the Catholic candidate for President.
I am the Democratic Party's candidate for President who happens also to be a Catholic.
I do not speak for my church on public matters; and the church does not speak for me. Whatever issue may come before me as President, if I should be elected, on birth control, divorce, censorship, gambling or any other subject, I will make my decision in accordance with these views – in accordance with what my conscience tells me to be in the national interest, and without regard to outside religious pressure or dictates. And no power or threat of punishment could cause me to decide otherwise.
But if the time should ever come – and I do not concede any conflict to be remotely possible – when my office would require me to either violate my conscience or violate the national interest, then I would resign the office; and I hope any other conscientious public servant would do likewise.
But I do not intend to apologize for these views to my critics of either Catholic or Protestant faith; nor do I intend to disavow either my views or my church in order to win this election.
If I should lose on the real issues, I shall return to my seat in the Senate, satisfied that I'd tried my best and was fairly judged.
But if this election is decided on the basis that 40 million Americans lost their chance of being President on the day they were baptized, then it is the whole nation that will be the loser, in the eyes of Catholics and non-Catholics around the world, in the eyes of history, and in the eyes of our own people.


No Locale Law can Supersede Union Law.
Executive Authority - The War Powers Act

The 5 Stars - The Authority to Execute - G.O.T.A.
Centered is the Perfect Square - The Symbol of Perfection - C.J.S.


D.B.A. Jesus Christ - G.O.T.A. & C.J.S.


Owner Name Address City State Current/Past
JESUS CHRIST, INC 923 S. A AVE - ORDER OF ZEWS AVON PARK FL
C
JESUS CHRIST, INC 923 S. A. AVE - ORDER OF ZEWS AVON PARK FL
C
JESUS CHRIST, INC 923 S. A. AVE - ORDER OF ZEWS AVON PARK FL
C
JESUS CHRIST, INC 923 S. A. AVE - ORDER OF ZEWS AVON PARK FL
C
JESUS CHRIST, INC 923 S. A. AVE - ORDER OF ZEWS AVON PARK FL
C
JESUS CHRIST, INC 923 S. A. AVE - ORDER OF ZEWS AVON PARK FL
C
JESUS CHRIST, INC. 923 S. A. AVE - ORDER OF ZEWS AVON PARK FL
C
JESUS CHRIST, INC 923 S. A. AVE - ORDER OF ZEWS AVON PARK FL
C
JESUS CHRIST, INC 923 S. A. AVE ORDER OF ZEWS AVON PARK FL
C
JESUS CHRIST, INC 923 S. A. AVE ORDER OF ZEWS AVON PARK FL
C
JESUS CHRIST, INC 923 S. A. AVE ORDER OF ZEWS AVON PARK FL
C
JESUS CHRIST, INC. 923 S.A. AVE - ORDER OF ZEWS AVON PARK FL
C
JESUS CHRIST, INC 923 S.A. AVE - ORDER OF ZEWS AVON PARK FL
C
JESUS CHRIST, INC 923 S.A. AVE - ORDER OF ZEWS AVON PARK FL
C
JESUS CHRIST, INC 923 S.A. AVE ORDER OF ZEWS AVON PARK FL
C
JESUS CHRIST, INC 923 SOUTH A AVE ORDER OF ZEWS AVON PARK FL
C
JESUS CHRIST, INC 923 SOUTH A AVE ORDER OF ZEWS AVON PARK FL
C

Jesus Christ, INC. Owns My Florida Corporation, INC. All activated Corporations falls under Chaka Zulu, INC., management.
All Corporations due to the December 2015 amendment after the first phase of Paul’s Journey, I made it known the Union State, I had to eminent domain every nonprofit corporation to prevent the overthrow of this Union. Signed God. And on 4 July 2015 – I signed the Amendment to prevent ongoing distractions and fraud within my own nonprofit corporation, in the Title God. The U.S, Constitution acknowledged I was God, DBA Jesus Christ and had exclusive right to the use also of the title, Queen of Queens and Queen’s Queen abbreviated QQ.
These Corporations will be used to restore the economic structure and the process of getting on board is to apply to serve this Union. Either you are DOD, WAC, MAC, Civilian or an enemy to this Union.
The Right to Work Law is constitutional, if you don’t work you done eat and the right to work is the right to eat. Remember charity needs charity to do charity. If I had 10 trucks filled with great meats, weed, vegetables and even medicine, must I order to food and stuff to get off the truck without assistance?
With 95% of the population gone and a lot of the real estate disproportionately still standing, everyone can have a mansion, but can everyone maintain a house so big? 

Activated Corporations by: Jesus Christ, INC

MASJID MUHAMMAD, INC, ORDER OF ZEWS, MY FLORIDA CORPORATION, INC, THE NATIONAL ASSOCIATION FOR THE ADVANCEMENT OF COLORED PEOPLE OR THE NAACP, MID FLORIDA, INC, IHEARTMEDIA + ENTERTAINMENT, INC., OPEN SOURCE CORPORATION + TRADEMARK IBM + MICROSOFT CORPORATION + GUITAR CENTER MANAGEMENT COMPANY, INC. + CIRCUIT CITY STORES, INC. + BEST BUY, INCORPORATED + + CHAKA ZULU, INC., OCKHEED MARTIN, INC + 3G CAPITAL MANAGEMENT, INC.+ BOEING, INC, CISCO SYSTEMS, INC, INTEL,INC, GOGGLE, INC, UMG COMMERCIAL SERVICES, INC, ELVIS PRESLEY TRADEMARK, THE SALVATION ARMY, USO, INC, BANCORP BANK, INC, THE SPORT'S AUTHORITY, CORP, CORPORATIONS TRADEMARK, CORPORATION, INC, VST-DST, INC, CLIC, INC, MIS, INC, CITI, PRUDENTIAL, SUNTRUST, ACES, DUKE ENERGY, GEORGIA POWER, FLORIDA HOSPITAL, STAPLES, INC, VERIZON, AT&T, SAVE A LOT + WALMART INC.+ TRADEMARK PUBLIX + 7-ELEVEN, INC.+ DAIMLERCHRYSLER CORPORATION + JAMES BROWN, INC. + SONY, INC + BRIDGEWATER ASSOCIATES INC, REVOLUTION CAPITAL GROUP, INC, BLACK ENTERTAINMENT TELEVISION, INC., CABLE NEWS NETWORK, INC., N.A.S.A. INCORPORATED, JETBLUE AIRWAYS CORPORATION, BLUEHOST CORPORATION, THE ASCAP FOUNDATION, H & P, CORPORATION + JOHNSON & JOHNSON, INC + HOST MARRIOTT CORPORATION, + RITZ CARLTON, INC + MARRIOTT THE TRADEMARK + GUIDESTAR USA, INC. PFIZER, INC, WIKIMEDIA FOUNDATION, INC, JESUS CHRIST TRADEMARK, EXXON TRADEMARK, GULF TRADEMARK, CHEVRON, TRADEMARK, MOBILE, CORP, AMTRAK, INC, GREYHOUND, INC, GEORGIA PACIFIC, CORP, U HAUL, INC, TIGER DIRECT, INC, HOME DEPOT, INC, OFFICE DEPOT, INC, REVERBNATION, CORP, LIVE NATION, INC, STEINBERG, CORP, PROPELLERHEAD, CORP, NATIVE INSTRUMENTS, INC, IK MULTIMEDIA, CORP, BIG FISH AUDIO, INC, CLIC, CORP, DST, INC.

No comments:

Post a Comment