Preparation To Economic Recovery

Execution of Fair Housing, Due Process and Privacy Rights

1. The Constitutionality Test is if law is good law, it cannot make a law already deemed Constitutional unconstitutional. Due Process v. Baker Act. The Baker Act of Florida is unconstitutional.
2. Right to Fair Housing and a right to enter once own premises. If a person is refused entry of their home based on slander and libel or preconceived notions, such acts may constitute hate crimes. If a person is found to be restricted or without access to their dwelling by persons without such authority and be it there is no statute of limitations to fraud. The simple short term remedy is an affidavit of Service.

Alert - Alert - Fill in 8,000 Starbucks Social Club -seller of Marijuana and Coffee products.  Located in Every Marriott International ASAP. 7-Eleven, Duane Reade, Starbucks Coffee - Pot, Subways, Some Fast Food Restaurants will run full services and get compensated by MAC - The USO.

Important - Non Adversary Law:

• The Government is the accuser - he broke the law?

• The People are charity and that is the Legal Aid Society of the NAACP.  They replace the Office of the Public Defender - Unconstitutional the Prosecution and the Defense has the same boss?

• The Office of the Legal Aid Society - The People say he si innocent until proven guilty and and has all Due Process Rights - U.S.C.U.G.

• The Detention is neutral and must follow Statutory Laws based on the Decision of the Court.  

• These Offices are now located in the Office of Inspector General -m The Appropriations Committee is Law Enforcement in his case the accuser and the O.I.G. answers the call for Justice.
• The Basic Outline for Affidavit of Service – As Hate Crimes Victim and member of protected group of Department of Jesus File: 3704895.
• Richmond County Hate Crimes Report Case#18-381668
• Baker Act between 40 and 50 times since moving to Highlands County, Florida in 2009.
• The Constant fraudulent entries on My Florida and even the Property Appraisal Office – Here in Highlands County, Florida.

1. Name and Address of the Victims and the home address of concern.
2. Reason for service – Victim require privacy and exercise right to be at dwelling denied to person and right of person to change the lock and demand a restraining order against the person who was in this home at time of service.
3. Law Enforcement may be an option to remove person to avoid confrontations.
4. The law of 90% of ownership is possession, is flawed as you can see. The possession is fraud based and hates crimes tactics used to hold on to it. Now possession changes for 30 days by nature of the service requirement of restraining order until issues of denied entry to home is resolved and the burden of proof is now on them, because now you have the 90% possession law riding with you and Hate Crimes Legislation under the Anti-Terror Act.

Office of the Inspector General - (O.I.G.)

Hate Crimes Victim and member of protected group Affidavit of Service Outline – For removal of person or persons associated unlawfully to the said person’s denial of access to property.

Name:

Address:

• Right to Access was denied – Right to Access upheld by the (U.S.S.C. 60 ABC)
• Right to Privacy Denied – Right to Privacy Upheld by the (U.S.S.C. 60 ABC)
• Right to Work Law is Constitutional – The Law of the Land. The right to work is the right to eat.

Baker Act Unconstitutional

Baker Act does not pass the constitutionality test, wherefore; it would make Due Process of the Law unconstitutional as an end run to Miranda Rights.

Constitutes: (False Arrest and/or Imprisonment) - w/ intent 40 to 50 times since 2009.

In Hindsight – The Question of Law from Mapp v. Ohio is;

Can a Police officer arrest you for an invalid Accusery?

The problem was not simply going into a home for one reason for find out a crime was being committed and to act on it. The issue was there was not crime being committed and to arrest t6hat person for possession of marijuana based on what laws? The question that was not addressed in Mapp v. Ohio is was there a valid Accusery to begin with?

DBA Jesus Christ

The Fair Housing Act & Redevelopment

The Fair Housing Act

The Fair Housing Act is a federal act in the United States intended to protect the buyer or renter of a dwelling from seller or landlord discrimination. Its primary prohibition makes it unlawful to refuse to sell, rent to, or negotiate with any person because of that person's inclusion in a protected class.

The Fair Housing Act is a federal act in the United States intended to protect the buyer or renter of a dwelling from seller or landlord discrimination. Its primary prohibition makes it unlawful to refuse to sell, rent to, or negotiate with any person because of that person's inclusion in a protected class.^[1] The goal is a unitary housing market in which a person's background (as opposed to financial resources) does not arbitrarily restrict access. Calls for open housing were issued early in the twentieth century, but it was not until after World War II that concerted efforts to achieve it were undertaken.

The legislation was the culmination of a civil rights campaign against housing discrimination in the United States and was approved by President Lyndon B. Johnson one week after the assassination of Martin Luther King, Jr.

The Fair Housing Act was enacted as Title VIII of the Civil Rights Act of 1968, and codified at 42 U.S.C. 3601-3619, with penalties for violation at 42 U.S.C. 3631. It is enforced by the United States Department of Housing and Urban Development.^[2]

The Fair Housing Act (Title VIII of the Civil Rights Act of 1968) introduced meaningful federal enforcement mechanisms. It outlaws:

·          Refusal to sell or rent a dwelling to any person because of race, color, disability, religion, sex, familial status, or national origin.

·          Discrimination based on race, color, religion, sex, disability, familial status, or national origin in the terms, conditions or privileges of sale or rental of a dwelling.

·          Advertising the sale or rental of a dwelling indicating preference, limitation, or discrimination based on race, color, religion, sex, handicap, familial status, disability or national origin.

·          Coercing, threatening, intimidating, or interfering with a person's enjoyment or exercise of housing rights based on discriminatory reasons or retaliating against a person or organization that aids or encourages the exercise or enjoyment of fair housing rights.

When the Fair Housing Act was first enacted, it prohibited discrimination only on the basis of race, color, religion, and national origin.^[3] Sex was added as a protected characteristic in 1974.^[4] In 1988, disability and familial status (the presence or anticipated presence of children under 18 in a household) were added (further codified in the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990).^[3] In certain circumstances, the law allows limited exceptions for discrimination based on sex, religion, or familial status.^[5]

In 2017, a federal judge ruled that sexual orientation and gender identity are protected classes under the Fair Housing Act.[6][7] As of May 2018, there is an additional pending effort to amend the Fair Housing Act to make this explicit (HR 1447).^[8] In a meeting on May 16, 2018 with the National Association of Realtors (NAR), Rep. Dana Rohrabacher (R-Calif.), who is campaigning for his 16th term, said he believed that homeowners should be allowed to refuse to sell their home to gay and lesbian homebuyers. NAR disagreed and withdrew its endorsement of the Congressman over the matter.^[9]

The United States Department of Housing and Urban Development is the federal executive department with the statutory authority to administer and enforce the Fair Housing Act. The Secretary of Housing and Urban Development has delegated fair housing enforcement and compliance activities to HUD's Office of Fair Housing and Equal Opportunity (FHEO) and HUD's Office of General Counsel. FHEO is one of the United States' largest federal civil rights agencies. It has a staff of more than 600 people located in 54 offices around the United States. As of August 2017, the head of FHEO is Assistant Secretary for Fair Housing and Equal Opportunity Anna Maria Farias, whose appointment was confirmed on August 3, 2017.^[10]

The Fair Housing Act (Title VIII of the Civil Rights Act of 1968) introduced meaningful federal enforcement mechanisms. It outlaws:

·          Refusal to sell or rent a dwelling to any person because of race, color, disability, religion, sex, familial status, or national origin.

·          Discrimination based on race, color, religion, sex, disability, familial status, or national origin in the terms, conditions or privileges of sale or rental of a dwelling.

·          Advertising the sale or rental of a dwelling indicating preference, limitation, or discrimination based on race, color, religion, sex, handicap, familial status, disability or national origin.

·          Coercing, threatening, intimidating, or interfering with a person's enjoyment or exercise of housing rights based on discriminatory reasons or retaliating against a person or organization that aids or encourages the exercise or enjoyment of fair housing rights.

When the Fair Housing Act was first enacted, it prohibited discrimination only on the basis of race, color, religion, and national origin.^[3] Sex was added as a protected characteristic in 1974.^[4] In 1988, disability and familial status (the presence or anticipated presence of children under 18 in a household) were added (further codified in the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990).^[3] In certain circumstances, the law allows limited exceptions for discrimination based on sex, religion, or familial status.^[5]

In 2017, a federal judge ruled that sexual orientation and gender identity are protected classes under the Fair Housing Act.[6][7] As of May 2018, there is an additional pending effort to amend the Fair Housing Act to make this explicit (HR 1447).^[8] In a meeting on May 16, 2018 with the National Association of Realtors (NAR), Rep. Dana Rohrabacher (R-Calif.), who is campaigning for his 16th term, said he believed that homeowners should be allowed to refuse to sell their home to gay and lesbian homebuyers. NAR disagreed and withdrew its endorsement of the Congressman over the matter.^[9]

The United States Department of Housing and Urban Development is the federal executive department with the statutory authority to administer and enforce the Fair Housing Act. The Secretary of Housing and Urban Development has delegated fair housing enforcement and compliance activities to HUD's Office of Fair Housing and Equal Opportunity (FHEO) and HUD's Office of General Counsel. FHEO is one of the United States' largest federal civil rights agencies. It has a staff of more than 600 people located in 54 offices around the United States. As of August 2017, the head of FHEO is Assistant Secretary for Fair Housing and Equal Opportunity Anna Maria Farias, whose appointment was confirmed on August 3, 2017.^[10]

The Fair Housing Act has been strengthened since its adoption in 1968, but enforcement continues to be a concern among housing advocates. According to a 2010 evaluation of Analysis of Impediments (AI) reports done by the Government Accountability Office, enforcement is particularly inconsistent across local jurisdictions.^[11]

·          Housing discrimination (United States)

·          Stuyvesant Town–Peter Cooper Village#Controversy - Post-war project that was involved in controversy for refusing to admit African-Americans.

·          Buchanan v. Warley

·          Department of Fair Employment and Housing

·          Civil rights campaign in Seattle (Fair housing campaign in the 1960s)

·          Office of Fair Housing and Equal Opportunity[1]

Variations on redevelopment include:

·        Urban infill on vacant parcels that have no existing activity but were previously developed, especially on Brownfield land, such as the redevelopment of an industrial site into a mixed-use development.

·        Constructing with a denser land usage, such as the redevelopment of a block of townhouses into a large apartment building.

·        Adaptive reuse, where older structures are converted for improved current market use, such as an industrial mill into housing lofts.

Redevelopment projects can be small or large ranging from a single building to entire new neighborhoods or "new town in town" projects.

Redevelopment also refers to state and federal statutes which give cities and counties the authority to establish redevelopment agencies and give the agencies the authority to attack problems of urban decay. The fundamental tools of a redevelopment agency include the authority to acquire real property, the power of eminent domain, to develop and sell property without bidding and the authority and responsibility of relocating persons who have interests in the property acquired by the agency. The financing/funding of such operations might come from government grants, borrowing from federal or state governments and selling bonds and from Tax Increment Financing.

Other terms sometimes used to describe redevelopment include urban renewal (urban revitalization). While efforts described as urban revitalization often involve redevelopment, they do not always involve redevelopment as they do not always involve the demolition of any existing structures but may instead describe the rehabilitation of existing buildings or other neighborhood improvement initiatives.

A new example of other neighborhood improvement initiatives is the funding mechanism associated with high carbon foot printair quality urban blight. Assembly Bill AB811 is the State of California's answer to funding renewable energy and allows cities to craft their own sustainability action plans. These cutting edge action plans needs the funding structure; which can easily come forward through redevelopment funding.

Urban renewal

Main article: Urban renewal

Some redevelopment projects and programs have been incredibly controversial including the Urban Renewal program in the United States in the mid-twentieth century or the urban regeneration program in Great Britain. Controversy usually results either from the use of eminent domain, from objections to the change in use or increases in density and intensity on the site or from disagreement on the appropriate use of tax-payer funds to pay for some element of the project. Urban redevelopment in the United States has been controversial because it forcibly displaces poor and lower middle class populations and turns over their land to wealthy redevelopers for free or for a below-market-value price. They then use that land to construct private shopping malls, office buildings, automobile factories and dealerships, and even gambling casinos. This is done and permitted by American courts in spite of the fact that the Fifth Amendment to the United States Constitution allows the use of eminent domain only for "public use."^{[citation needed]}

The residents displaced by redevelopment are routinely undercompensated,^{[citation needed]} and some (notably month-to-month tenants and business owners) are not compensated at all. Historically, redevelopment agencies have been buying many properties in redevelopment areas for prices below their fair market value, or even below the agencies' own appraisal figures because the displaced people are often unaware of their legal rights and lack the will and the funds to mount a proper legal defense in a valuation trial. Those who do so usually recover more in compensation than what is offered by the redevelopment agencies.

The controversy over misuse of eminent domain for redevelopment reached a climax in the wake of the U.S. Supreme Court's 2005 5 to 4 decision in Kelo v. City of New London, allowing redevelopment takings of sound, unblighted homes, solely to allow redevelopers to put the taken land to more profitable uses and thus increase the revenue flow to the local municipality. The Kelodecision was widely denounced and remains the subject of severe criticism. Remedial legislation has been introduced and in some cases passed, in a number of states.

Golf course redevelopment

Golf course redevelopment, also known as golf course conversion is a real estate niche, in which investors purchase failing golf courses. Investors then subdivide the golf course into individual plots of lands. They then resell the plots of land for builders, or build on the plots then resell it to residential home buyers. This process is usually done with the assistance of a real estate broker.

The main challenge of this niche is the difficulties that investors face in requesting a variance from cities.^[1]

Notable examples

Further information: Category: Redeveloped  ports and waterfronts

Further information: Area redevelopment plan and Canada Lands Company

This list is incomplete; you can help by expanding it.

North America:

·        Atlantic Station, Atlanta, Georgia

·        Atlantic Yards, Brooklyn, New York

·        American Tobacco Historic District, Durham, North Carolina

·        CFB Downsview -> Downsview Park, Toronto, Ontario

·        CFB Griesbach -> Griesbach, Edmonton, Alberta

·        CN rail yard -> Station Lands (Edmonton), MacEwan University, Edmonton downtown arena; Edmonton, Alberta

·        Edmonton City Centre (Blatchford Field) Airport -> Blatchford, Edmonton, Alberta

·        HOPE VI

·        Hudson Yards, New York, New York

·        Lincoln Center for the Performing Arts, New York, New York

·        Midtown Detroit, Michigan

·        Mission Bay, Treasure Island, Western Addition, and the part of South of Market that become Moscone Center and Yerba Buena Gardens in San Francisco, California

·        Pearl District, Portland, Oregon

·        Old Port of Montreal, Quebec

·        Downtown San Diego, California

·        Stapleton, Denver, Colorado, on a former airport site

·        Toronto Waterfront, Toronto, Canada

·        West End, Boston, Massachusetts

·        World Trade Center site in Lower Manhattan following the September 11 attacks

Europe:

·        Canary Wharf, London (UK)

·        Edinburgh Waterfront, UK

·        Redevelopment of Norrmalm (Sweden)

·        Liverpool One, Liverpool (UK)

·        Greenwich Millennium Village, London (UK)

·        Tigné Point, Sliema (Malta)

Asia:

·        Beijing Olympic Village

·        Sheung Wan (Hong Kong)

Central America:

·        Panama in Casco Antiguo (Casco Viejo)

See also

·        Adaptive reuse

·        Urban Renewal

·        Community development

·        Community redevelopment agency

·        Megaproject

·        Infill

·        Land use conflict

·        Business improvement district

Jesus Christ, INC. and Managed by:

Chaka Zulu, INC.

The Union State Constitution under God

U.S.C.U.G. and D.O.E. Article 441-Y

Jesus Christ and Chaka Zulu are synonymous:

JESUS CHRIST, INC
923 S.A. AVE - ORDER OF ZEWS
AVON PARK, FL 33825

FEI/EIN Number: 27-1151849
Document Number: N16000009754

Jesus Christ, INC., The National Community Network, INC., My Florida Corporations, INC., Mid Florida Credit Union, INC., BANCORP BANK, INC.,  NAACP or The National Association  For the Advancement of Colored People, INC., Masjid Muhammad, INC., The Queendom of Jesus Paul Messiah, INC., Order of ZEWS, INC., IHEARTMEDIA + ENTERTAINMENT, INC.,

OPEN SOURCE CORPORATION + TRADEMARK IBM + MICROSOFT CORPORATION + GUITAR CENTER MANAGEMENT COMPANY, INC. + CIRCUIT CITY STORES, INC. + BEST BUY, INCORPORATED + + CHAKA ZULU, INC.

REVOLUTION CAPITAL GROUP, INC, BLACK ENTERTAINMENT TELEVISION, INC., CABLE NEWS NETWORK, INC., N.A.S.A. INCORPORATED, JETBLUE AIRWAYS CORPORATION, BLUEHOST CORPORATION, THE ASCAP FOUNDATION,

SAVE A LOT + WALMART INC.+ TRADEMARK PUBLIX + 7-ELEVEN, INC.+ DAIMLERCHRYSLER CORPORATION + JAMES BROWN, INC. + SONY, INC + BRIDGEWATER ASSOCIATES INC

LOCKHEED MARTIN, INC + 3G CAPITAL MANAGEMENT, INC.+ BOEING, INC, CISCO SYSTEMS, INC, INTEL,INC, GOGGLE, INC, UMG COMMERCIAL SERVICES, INC, ELVIS PRESLEY TRADEMARK, THE SALVATION ARMY, USO, INC

G.O.T.A. & C.S.J.

Owner Name	Address	City	State	Current/Past
JESUS CHRIST, INC	923 S. A AVE - ORDER OF ZEWS	AVON PARK	FL	C
JESUS CHRIST, INC	923 S. A. AVE - ORDER OF ZEWS	AVON PARK	FL	C
JESUS CHRIST, INC	923 S. A. AVE - ORDER OF ZEWS	AVON PARK	FL	C
JESUS CHRIST, INC	923 S. A. AVE - ORDER OF ZEWS	AVON PARK	FL	C
JESUS CHRIST, INC	923 S. A. AVE - ORDER OF ZEWS	AVON PARK	FL	C
JESUS CHRIST, INC	923 S. A. AVE - ORDER OF ZEWS	AVON PARK	FL	C
JESUS CHRIST, INC.	923 S. A. AVE - ORDER OF ZEWS	AVON PARK	FL	C
JESUS CHRIST, INC	923 S. A. AVE - ORDER OF ZEWS	AVON PARK	FL	C
JESUS CHRIST, INC	923 S. A. AVE ORDER OF ZEWS	AVON PARK	FL	C
JESUS CHRIST, INC.	923 S.A. AVE - ORDER OF ZEWS	AVON PARK	FL	C
JESUS CHRIST, INC	923 S.A. AVE - ORDER OF ZEWS	AVON PARK	FL	C
JESUS CHRIST, INC	923 S.A. AVE - ORDER OF ZEWS	AVON PARK	FL	C

Preparation To Economic Recovery 

The Dec. 2015 Amendment was the defining moment ending Paul's Journey.  The phone number on that account at that time was: 917-701-9427 the phone was given to aka Little Dale to use until Ella turned his phone on. Is "Marian" I saw Carolyn in Augusta twin is Marilyn "Cat Eyes."    He gave it to Shawanda without my permission. I asked for it back, Shawanda said I lost it, I threw it in the lake.  This phone number will link to her corporate fraud.

Although state laws vary, current statutes permit federal prosecution of hate crimes committed on the basis of a person's protected characteristics of race, religion, ethnicity, nationality, gender, sexual orientation, gender identity, and disability.

Corporate Name	Document Number	Status
THE NATIONAL COMMUNITY NETWORK, INC	N09000010173	NAME HS
NATIONAL COMMUNITY NETWORK, INC.	P96000027136	INACT
THE NATIONAL COMMUNITY NETWORK & COALITION OF HIGHLANDS, INC	N09000010173	NAME HS

Hate crime laws in the United States - Wikipedia

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hate_crime_laws_in_the_United_States

1. U.S. Code › Title 18 › Part I › Chapter 13 › § 247

18 U.S. Code § 247 - Damage to religious property; obstruction of persons in the free exercise of religious beliefs

• US Code
• Notes

prev | next

(a)Whoever, in any of the circumstances referred to in subsection (b) of this section—

(1)

intentionally defaces, damages, or destroys any religious real property, because of the religious character of that property, or attempts to do so; or

(2)

intentionally obstructs, by force or threat of force, any personin the enjoyment of that person’s free exercise of religious beliefs, or attempts to do so;

shall be punished as provided in subsection (d).

(b)

The circumstances referred to in subsection (a) are that the offense is in or affects interstate or foreign commerce.

(c)

Whoever intentionally defaces, damages, or destroys any religious real property because of the race, color, or ethnic characteristics of any individual associated with that religious property, or attempts to do so, shall be punished as provided in subsection (d).

(d)The punishment for a violation of subsection (a) of this section shall be—

(1)

if death results from acts committed in violation of this section or if such acts include kidnapping or an attempt to kidnap, aggravated sexual abuse or an attempt to commit aggravated sexual abuse, or an attempt to kill, a fine in accordance with this title and imprisonment for any term of years or for life, or both, or may be sentenced to death;

(2)

if bodily injury results to any person, including any public safety officer performing duties as a direct or proximate result of conduct prohibited by this section, and the violation is by means of fire or an explosive, a fine under this title or imprisonment for not more that 40 years, or both;

(3)

if bodily injury to any person, including any public safety officer performing duties as a direct or proximate result of conduct prohibited by this section, results from the acts committed in violation of this section or if such acts include the use, attempted use, or threatened use of a dangerous weapon, explosives, or fire, a fine in accordance with this title and imprisonment for not more than 20 years, or both; and

(4)

in any other case, a fine in accordance with this title and imprisonment for not more than one year, or both.

(e)

No prosecution of any offense described in this section shall be undertaken by the United States except upon the certification in writing of the Attorney General or his designee that in his judgment a prosecution by the United States is in the public interest and necessary to secure substantial justice.

(f)

As used in this section, the term “religious real property” means any church, synagogue, mosque, religious cemetery, or other religious real property, including fixtures or religious objects contained within a place of religious worship.

(g)

No person shall be prosecuted, tried, or punished for any noncapital offense under this section unless the indictment is found or the information is instituted not later than 7 years after the date on which the offense was committed.

(Added Pub. L. 100–346, § 1, June 24, 1988, 102 Stat. 644; amended Pub. L. 103–322, title VI, § 60006(d), title XXXII, § 320103(d), Sept. 13, 1994, 108 Stat. 1971, 2110; Pub. L. 104–155, § 3, July 3, 1996, 110 Stat. 1392; Pub. L. 104–294, title VI, §§ 601(c)(3), 605(r), Oct. 11, 1996, 110 Stat. 3499, 3511; Pub. L. 107–273, div. B, title IV, § 4002(c)(1), (e)(4), Nov. 2, 2002, 116 Stat. 1808, 1810.)

The Fair Housing Act is a federal act in the United States intended to protect the buyer or renter of a dwelling from seller or landlord discrimination. Its primary prohibition makes it unlawful to refuse to sell, rent to, or negotiate with any person because of that person's inclusion in a protected class.

Fair Housing Act - Wikipedia

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fair_Housing_Act

State Rights Unconstitutional

The Fugitive Slave Law or Fugitive Slave Act was passed by the United States Congress on September 18, 1850, as part of the Compromise of 1850 between Southern slave-holding interests and Northern Free-Soilers. ... Abolitionists nicknamed it the "BloodhoundLaw" for the dogs that were used to track down runaway slaves.

Fugitive Slave Act of 1850 - Wikipedia

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fugitive_Slave_Act_of_1850

Jesus Christ, INC. and managed by:

Chaka Zulu, INC.

The Union State Constitution under God

U.S.C.U.G. and D.O.E. Article 441-Y

Jesus Christ and Chaka Zulu are synonymous:

JESUS CHRIST, INC
923 S.A. AVE - ORDER OF ZEWS
AVON PARK, FL 33825

Chaka Zulu, INC.  Management of Jesus Christ, INC

The Banking Institutions:

1. Mid Florida Credit Union, INC + Bancorp Bank, INC - Insured by the U.S.C.U.G.
2. Liquid Capital: Bridgewater Associates

Sub Divisions:

Code Red – Communications Security Level 9:

1. Music Choice a giveaway of artist copyrights free 24/7 on cable television.  Owned by I-Heart-Media + Entertainment.  Take it off the air.  

2. Freedom of Press - Ice T, Pall and Hall, got this duty via HOST MARRIOTT. CORPORATION

Media and Entertainment:

1. CHAKA ZULU, INC
2.  HOST MARRIOTT CORPORATION
3. OPEN SOURCE CORPORATION
4. TRADEMARK IBM
5. MICROSOFT CORPORATION
6. GUITAR CENTER MANAGEMENT COMPANY, INC
7. ELVIS PRESLEY TRADEMARK
8. CIRCUIT CITY STORES
9. BEST BUY, INCORPORATED
10. IHEARTMEDIA + ENTERTAINMENT, INC.,
11. REVOLUTION CAPITAL GROUP, INC
12. BLACK ENTERTAINMENT TELEVISION, INC.,
13. CABLE NEWS NETWORK, INC
14. N.A.S.A. INCORPORATED
15. BLUEHOST CORPORATION
16. THE ASCAP FOUNDATION
17. SONY, INC
18. H & P, CORPORATION
19. JETBLUE AIRWAYS CORPORATION
20. JAMES BROWN, INC
21. UMG COMMERCIAL SERVICES
22. THE SALVATION ARMY
23. WIKIMEDIA FOUNDATION, INC – The Image Depository and Wikipedia owned by Wikimidiea.org
24. YouTube belongs to Bancorp Bank, INC. Owned by Jesus Christ, INC. – The audio/video depository.
25. DAIMLERCHRYSLER CORPORATION
26. CISCO SYSTEMS
27. GOGGLE, INC
28. Introducing: AUTO-WORD.ORG  

Bringing a face left to social media: Combining the Resources of Blue Host, Wikipedia, You Tube, Wiki Commons - Comes AUTO-WORD.  The authorized Autobiography,  For the first time  humankind will remember what happened at the end.  HIS-Story in Hindsight – MY’s-Story the Truth – I Lived to tell my own story.

Retail Stores 

Production Process

Services

Jesus Christ, INC., The National Community Network, INC., My Florida Corporations, INC., Mid Florida Credit Union, INC., BANCORP BANK, INC.,  NAACP or The National Association  For the Advancement of Colored People, INC., Masjid Muhammad, INC., The Queendom of Jesus Paul Messiah, INC., Order of ZEWS, INC., IHEARTMEDIA + ENTERTAINMENT, INC.,

OPEN SOURCE CORPORATION + TRADEMARK IBM + MICROSOFT CORPORATION + GUITAR CENTER MANAGEMENT COMPANY, INC. + CIRCUIT CITY STORES, INC. + BEST BUY, INCORPORATED + CHAKA ZULU, INC.

REVOLUTION CAPITAL GROUP, INC, BLACK ENTERTAINMENT TELEVISION, INC., CABLE NEWS NETWORK, INC., N.A.S.A. INCORPORATED, JETBLUE AIRWAYS CORPORATION, BLUEHOST CORPORATION, THE ASCAP FOUNDATION,

SAVE A LOT + WALMART INC.+ TRADEMARK PUBLIX + 7-ELEVEN, INC.+ DAIMLERCHRYSLER CORPORATION + JAMES BROWN, INC. + SONY, INC + BRIDGEWATER ASSOCIATES INC

LOCKHEED MARTIN, INC + 3G CAPITAL MANAGEMENT, INC.+ BOEING, INC, CISCO SYSTEMS, INC, INTEL,INC, GOGGLE, INC, UMG COMMERCIAL SERVICES, INC, ELVIS PRESLEY TRADEMARK, THE SALVATION ARMY, USO, INC

H & P, CORPORATION + JOHNSON & JOHNSON, INC + HOST MARRIOTT CORPORATION, + RITZ CARLTON, INC + MARRIOTT THE TRADEMARK + GUIDESTAR USA, INC. PFIZER, INC, WIKIMEDIA FOUNDATION, INC

                                                            D.B.A. Jesus Christ 

                                                            G.O.T.A. & C.S.J.