By:
D.B.A. Jesus Christ - G.O.T.A., & C.J.S. United State of Chaka
Zulu
Constitutional
Decree - 60 ABC - Statutory Law and the Rights to Sexual
Orientation
- Constitutional Meets Constitutionality Test Criteria.
Order
of ZEWS – Religion Doctrine – Sexual Orientation and Union Rights
1 Corinthians 7 New International Version (NIV)
Concerning Married Life
7 Now
for the matters you wrote about: “It is good for a man not to have
sexual relations with a woman.” 2 But
since sexual immorality is occurring, each man should have sexual
relations with his own wife, and each woman with her own
husband. 3 The
husband should fulfill his marital duty to his wife, and
likewise the wife to her husband. 4 The
wife does not have authority over her own body but yields it to her
husband. In the same way, the husband does not have authority over
his own body but yields it to his wife. 5 Do
not deprive each other except perhaps by mutual consent and for a
time, so that you may devote yourselves to prayer. Then come
together again so that Satan will not tempt you because of
your lack of self-control. 6 I
say this as a concession, not as a command. 7 I
wish that all of you were as I am. But each of you has your own
gift from God; one has this gift, another has that.
8 Now
to the unmarried[a] and
the widows I say: It is good for them to stay unmarried, as I
do. 9 But
if they cannot control themselves, they should marry, for it is
better to marry than to burn with passion.
10 To
the married I give this command (not I, but the Lord): A wife must
not separate from her husband. 11 But
if she does, she must remain unmarried or else be reconciled to her
husband. And a husband must not divorce his wife.
Statutory
Law & Sexual Relations
Can
a Person be found guilty in the court of law for statutory rape based
on state law and the institution of Marriage?
No.
Wherefore,
marriage was unconstitutional since the
declaration of independence,
a
separation agreement.
Wherefore,
if a human is married under the law of marriage, it would be a
criminal act, under the pretense of this law to get married to
another person while still married to another person under a
separation agreement,
Wherefore
under a separation agreement there is still the presumption of
marriage, until
a
final decree is determined. Divorce – Settlement Annulment – no
settlement.
Wherefore,
to get married while legally separated could be considered bigamy.
Field
Order #15
Wherefore,
if a person sought after a legal separation due to an abusive
situation, the
Court
may decide the best arrangement for the abused pending the final
legal decree, to an order
of protection,
can be granted to prevent further abuse while a final decree is
sought.
Wherefore,
the abuse spouse realizes he/she is still presumed to be married,
Wherefore,
in such an arrangement there is no marriage rights. And there are
grounds for an annulment rather than a divorce, if reconciliation is
not possible or desired,
- Incompatibility.
- No Consummation, Wherefore, marriage cannot be established, the
- People involved are not loved and this is mutual.
- Wherefore, if one attempts person loves the other, yet is left unloved, there, this too is grounds for an annulment.
Wherefore,
a divorce is the final decree, there may be issues of settlement and
Support
of family and children, under an annulment, there is not settlement,
Wherefore
it is as if the marriage never existed.
Wherefore,
any property gained based on this marriage, is determined to be by
the Law, gained based on a fraudulent arrangement and there is no
Statute
of limitations to fraud.
Wherefore
the
annulment of article 6 of
the U.S. Constitution., by the War Power Act, G.O.T.A.,
who has Executive
Authority
Executive
Authority
passes all constitutionality tests, U.S.C.U.G. and by Congressional
approval.
The
Final decree of annulment
between
the law the Union
and the
lawless
the Confederate, Better known as the NAZI.
Wherefore, to do lawless acts with the intent of being lawless, is an
act of being
Anti-law.
Wherefore,
God is the
Law and
certainly under the War Powers Act and with
Executive
Authority, not only is God the law, but his authority by the U.S.
Constitution has been duly recognized, acknowledged and verified.
Anti-Law
is Anti-Christ.
Read
- Holy Bible New International Version 2014 - John: 8:12-19, 1 CO:
11:3 and
Palms:
118:22,
Wherefore,
there is no law of marriage, there can be no statutory laws
concerning
Sexual
practice based on the law of marriage. However, Amendments 35 thru 41
and the1st and 2nd amendments and the Civil Rights Act of 1964,
dealing with the right to
Sexual
orientation and not asexual orientation, makes it clear and
constitutional, this is a Union.
Wherefore,
the laws
of statutory rape is determined by the law of Union and
the law
of
Unions are religion
decree and
the only religion sanctioned
by God is Order of
ZEWS.
And
let us not confuse religion’s doctrine with the Church in
congregation.
Wherefore,
there can be no statutory crime based on a nonexistent statutory law.
Citations:
The
Union State Constitution under God
1.
The 1st Amendment
2.
The 2nd Amendment
3.
The Civil Rights Act of 1964
4.
USCUG Amendments 35 thru 41
5.
The Declaration of Emancipation - Article 441-Y
6.
The War Powers Act & the Constitutional Decrees
7.
Statutory Law on Fraud
8.
The 4th Amendment
9.
18 USC
10
Statutory Law and the lack of statutory Law and Criminal Law
11.
Field Order #15 - Signed by Major Gen. Sherman - As His Duty
Assignment
12.
The Declaration of Independence
13.
The annulment of Article 6 from the U.S. Constitution
13
Chaka
Zulu. Chaka
Mosi Kamanu Zulu v. Egan 1
A.D.3d 649 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)
Annulment
of Article 6 from the U.S. Constitution
Article
Six of
the United
States Constitution establishes the laws and treaties of
the United
States made in accordance with it as the supreme law of the
land, forbids a religious test as a requirement for holding a
governmental position and holds the United States under the
Constitution responsible for debts incurred by the United States
under the Articles of Confederation.
All
Debts contracted and Engagements entered into, before the Adoption of
this Constitution, shall be as valid against the United States under
this Constitution, as under the Confederation.
This
Constitution, and the Laws of the United States which shall be made
in Pursuance thereof; and all Treaties made, or which shall be made,
under the Authority of the United States, shall be the supreme Law of
the Land; and the Judges in every State shall be bound thereby, any
Thing in the Constitution or Laws of any State to the Contrary
notwithstanding.
The
Senators and Representatives before mentioned, and the Members of the
several State Legislatures, and all executive and judicial Officers,
both of the United States and of the several States, shall be bound
by Oath or Affirmation, to support this Constitution; but no
religious Test shall ever be required as a Qualification to any
Office or public Trust under the United States.[1]
Debts
The
first clause of the Article provides that debts contracted prior to
the adoption of the Constitution remain valid, as they were under
the Articles
of Confederation.
Supremacy
Main
article: Supremacy
Clause
Clause
two provides that the Constitution, federal laws made pursuant to it
and treaties made under its authority, constitute the supreme law of
the land. It provides that state
courts are bound by the supreme law; in case of conflict
between federal and state law, the federal law must be applied.
Even state
constitutions are subordinate to federal law.
The
Supreme Court under John
Marshall was influential in construing the supremacy clause.
It first ruled that it had the power to review the decisions of state
courts allegedly in conflict with the supreme law, claims of "state
sovereignty" notwithstanding. In Martin
v. Hunter's Lessee (1816),
the Supreme Court confronted the Chief Justice of Virginia, Spencer
Roane, who had previously declared a Supreme Court decision
unconstitutional and refused to permit the state courts to abide by
it. The Court upheld the Judiciary Act, which permitted it to hear
appeals from state courts, on the grounds that Congress had passed it
under the supremacy clause.
The
Supreme Court has also struck down attempts by states to control or
direct the affairs of federal institutions. McCulloch
v. Maryland (1819)
was a significant case in this regard. The state of Maryland had
levied a tax on banks not chartered by the state; the tax applied,
state judges ruled, to the Bank of the United States chartered by
Congress in 1816. Marshall wrote that "the States have no power,
by taxation or otherwise, to retard, impede, burden, or in any manner
control, the operations of the constitutional laws enacted by
Congress to carry into execution the powers vested in the general
government." United States property is wholly immune to state
taxation, as are government activities and institutions. Congress may
explicitly provide immunity from taxation in certain cases, for
instance by immunizing a federal contractor. Federal employees,
however, may not be immunized from taxes, as the tax would not in any
way impede government activities.
Gibbons
v. Ogden (1824)
was another influential case involving the supremacy clause. The
state of New
York had granted Aaron Ogden a monopoly over the steamboat
business in the Hudson
River. The other party, Thomas Gibbons, had obtained a federal
permit under the Coastal Licensing Act to perform the same task. The
Supreme Court upheld the federal permit. John Marshall wrote, "The
nullity of an act, inconsistent with the Constitution, is produced by
the declaration, that the Constitution is the supreme law. The
appropriate application of that part of the clause which confers the
same supremacy on laws and treaties, is to such acts of the State
legislatures as do not transcend their powers, but though enacted in
the execution of acknowledged State powers, interfere with, or are
contrary to the laws of Congress, made in pursuance of the
Constitution, or some treaty made under the authority of the United
States. In every such case, the act of Congress, or the treaty, is
supreme; and the law of the State, though enacted in the exercise of
powers not controverted, must yield to it."
Reid
v. Covert (1957)
ruled that no branch of the United States Government can have powers
conferred upon it by treaty that have not been conferred by
the United
States Constitution.
Oaths
Federal
and state legislators, executive officers and judges are, by the
third clause of the article, bound by oath or affirmation to
support the Constitution. Congress may determine the form of such an
oath. In Ex
parte Garland (1866),
the Supreme Court held that a test oath would violate the
Constitution, so it invalidated the law requiring the following oath:
I,
A. B., do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I have never voluntarily
borne arms against the United States since I have been a citizen
thereof; that I have voluntarily given no aid, countenance, counsel,
or encouragement to persons engaged in armed hostility thereto; that
I have neither sought nor accepted, not attempted to exercise the
functions of any office whatever, under any authority or pretended
authority in hostility to the United States; that I have not yielded
a voluntary support to any pretended government, authority, power, or
constitution with the United States, hostile or inimical thereto...
The
Supreme Court found that the law constituted an unconstitutional ex
post facto law,
for it retroactively punished the offenses mentioned in the oath by
preventing those who committed them from taking office.
Congress
may not require religious tests for an office under the United
States. Thus, Congress may include the customary words "so help
me God" in an oath, but an individual would be under no
compulsion to utter them, as such a requirement would constitute a
religious test.
The
current oath administered is as follows:
Updated
G.O.T.A.:
I,
[name], do
solemnly swear
(or affirm) that I will support and defend the Constitution of the
Union State of Chaka Zulu against all enemies, foreign
and domestic;
that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; that I take
this obligation freely, without any mental reservation or purpose of
evasion; and that I will well and faithfully discharge the duties of
the office on which I am about to enter. [So help me God.]
Not
GOD. Gothic Oz Debar – But – Chaka Zulu – Palms: 118:22
During
the 1960 presidential campaign, the issue of whether the nation would
for the first time elect a Catholic to the highest office in the land
raised the specter of an implicit, but no less effective, religious
test. John
F. Kennedy, in his Address
to the Greater Houston Ministerial Association on 12
September 1960, addressed the question directly, saying,
[N]either
do I look with favor upon those who would work to subvert Article VI
of the Constitution by requiring a religious test, even by
indirection. For if they disagree with that safeguard, they should be
openly working to repeal it.
.
. . [C]ontrary to common newspaper usage, I am not the Catholic
candidate for President.
I
am the Democratic Party's candidate for President who happens also to
be a Catholic.
I
do not speak for my church on public matters; and the church does not
speak for me. Whatever issue may come before me as President, if I
should be elected, on birth control, divorce, censorship, gambling or
any other subject, I will make my decision in accordance with these
views – in accordance with what my conscience tells me to be in the
national interest, and without regard to outside religious pressure
or dictates. And no power or threat of punishment could cause me to
decide otherwise.
But
if the time should ever come – and I do not concede any conflict to
be remotely possible – when my office would require me to either
violate my conscience or violate the national interest, then I would
resign the office; and I hope any other conscientious public servant
would do likewise.
But
I do not intend to apologize for these views to my critics of either
Catholic or Protestant faith; nor do I intend to disavow either my
views or my church in order to win this election.
If
I should lose on the real issues, I shall return to my seat in the
Senate, satisfied that I'd tried my best and was fairly judged.
But
if this election is decided on the basis that 40 million Americans
lost their chance of being President on the day they were baptized,
then it is the whole nation that will be the loser, in the eyes of
Catholics and non-Catholics around the world, in the eyes of history,
and in the eyes of our own people.
No
Locale Law can Supersede Union Law.
Executive
Authority - The War Powers Act
The
5 Stars - The Authority to Execute - G.O.T.A.
Centered
is the Perfect Square - The Symbol of Perfection - C.J.S.
D.B.A.
Jesus Christ - G.O.T.A. & C.J.S.
| Owner Name | Address | City | State | Current/Past |
| JESUS CHRIST, INC | 923 S. A AVE - ORDER OF ZEWS | AVON PARK | FL |
C
|
| JESUS CHRIST, INC | 923 S. A. AVE - ORDER OF ZEWS | AVON PARK | FL |
C
|
| JESUS CHRIST, INC | 923 S. A. AVE - ORDER OF ZEWS | AVON PARK | FL |
C
|
| JESUS CHRIST, INC | 923 S. A. AVE - ORDER OF ZEWS | AVON PARK | FL |
C
|
| JESUS CHRIST, INC | 923 S. A. AVE - ORDER OF ZEWS | AVON PARK | FL |
C
|
| JESUS CHRIST, INC | 923 S. A. AVE - ORDER OF ZEWS | AVON PARK | FL |
C
|
| JESUS CHRIST, INC. | 923 S. A. AVE - ORDER OF ZEWS | AVON PARK | FL |
C
|
| JESUS CHRIST, INC | 923 S. A. AVE - ORDER OF ZEWS | AVON PARK | FL |
C
|
| JESUS CHRIST, INC | 923 S. A. AVE ORDER OF ZEWS | AVON PARK | FL |
C
|
| JESUS CHRIST, INC | 923 S. A. AVE ORDER OF ZEWS | AVON PARK | FL |
C
|
| JESUS CHRIST, INC | 923 S. A. AVE ORDER OF ZEWS | AVON PARK | FL |
C
|
| JESUS CHRIST, INC. | 923 S.A. AVE - ORDER OF ZEWS | AVON PARK | FL |
C
|
| JESUS CHRIST, INC | 923 S.A. AVE - ORDER OF ZEWS | AVON PARK | FL |
C
|
| JESUS CHRIST, INC | 923 S.A. AVE - ORDER OF ZEWS | AVON PARK | FL |
C
|
| JESUS CHRIST, INC | 923 S.A. AVE ORDER OF ZEWS | AVON PARK | FL |
C
|
| JESUS CHRIST, INC | 923 SOUTH A AVE ORDER OF ZEWS | AVON PARK | FL |
C
|
| JESUS CHRIST, INC | 923 SOUTH A AVE ORDER OF ZEWS | AVON PARK | FL |
C
|
Jesus
Christ, INC. Owns My Florida Corporation, INC. All activated
Corporations falls under Chaka Zulu, INC., management.
All Corporations
due to the December 2015 amendment after the first phase of Paul’s
Journey, I made it known the Union State, I had to eminent domain
every nonprofit corporation to prevent the overthrow of this Union.
Signed God. And on 4 July 2015 – I signed the Amendment to prevent
ongoing distractions and fraud within my own nonprofit corporation,
in the Title God. The U.S, Constitution acknowledged I was God, DBA
Jesus Christ and had exclusive right to the use also of the title,
Queen of Queens and Queen’s Queen abbreviated QQ.
These
Corporations will be used to restore the economic structure and the
process of getting on board is to apply to serve this Union. Either
you are DOD, WAC, MAC, Civilian or an enemy to this Union.
The
Right to Work Law is constitutional, if you don’t work you done eat
and the right to work is the right to eat. Remember charity needs
charity to do charity. If I had 10 trucks filled with great meats,
weed, vegetables and even medicine, must I order to food and stuff to
get off the truck without assistance?
With
95% of the population gone and a lot of the real estate
disproportionately still standing, everyone can have a mansion, but
can everyone maintain a house so big?
Activated Corporations by: Jesus Christ, INC
MASJID
MUHAMMAD, INC, ORDER OF ZEWS, MY FLORIDA CORPORATION, INC, THE
NATIONAL ASSOCIATION FOR THE ADVANCEMENT OF COLORED PEOPLE OR THE
NAACP, MID FLORIDA, INC, IHEARTMEDIA + ENTERTAINMENT, INC., OPEN
SOURCE CORPORATION + TRADEMARK IBM + MICROSOFT CORPORATION + GUITAR
CENTER MANAGEMENT COMPANY, INC. + CIRCUIT CITY STORES, INC. + BEST
BUY, INCORPORATED + + CHAKA ZULU, INC., OCKHEED MARTIN, INC + 3G
CAPITAL MANAGEMENT, INC.+ BOEING, INC, CISCO SYSTEMS, INC, INTEL,INC,
GOGGLE, INC, UMG COMMERCIAL SERVICES, INC, ELVIS PRESLEY TRADEMARK,
THE SALVATION ARMY, USO, INC, BANCORP BANK, INC, THE SPORT'S
AUTHORITY, CORP, CORPORATIONS TRADEMARK, CORPORATION, INC, VST-DST,
INC, CLIC, INC, MIS, INC, CITI, PRUDENTIAL, SUNTRUST, ACES, DUKE
ENERGY, GEORGIA POWER, FLORIDA HOSPITAL, STAPLES, INC, VERIZON, AT&T,
SAVE A LOT + WALMART INC.+ TRADEMARK PUBLIX + 7-ELEVEN, INC.+
DAIMLERCHRYSLER CORPORATION + JAMES BROWN, INC. + SONY, INC +
BRIDGEWATER ASSOCIATES INC, REVOLUTION CAPITAL GROUP,
INC, BLACK ENTERTAINMENT TELEVISION, INC., CABLE NEWS NETWORK, INC.,
N.A.S.A. INCORPORATED, JETBLUE AIRWAYS CORPORATION, BLUEHOST
CORPORATION, THE ASCAP FOUNDATION, H
& P, CORPORATION + JOHNSON & JOHNSON, INC + HOST MARRIOTT
CORPORATION, + RITZ CARLTON, INC + MARRIOTT THE TRADEMARK + GUIDESTAR
USA, INC. PFIZER, INC, WIKIMEDIA FOUNDATION, INC, JESUS CHRIST
TRADEMARK, EXXON TRADEMARK, GULF TRADEMARK, CHEVRON, TRADEMARK,
MOBILE, CORP, AMTRAK, INC, GREYHOUND, INC, GEORGIA PACIFIC, CORP, U
HAUL, INC, TIGER DIRECT, INC, HOME DEPOT, INC, OFFICE DEPOT, INC,
REVERBNATION, CORP, LIVE NATION, INC, STEINBERG, CORP, PROPELLERHEAD,
CORP, NATIVE INSTRUMENTS, INC, IK MULTIMEDIA, CORP, BIG FISH AUDIO,
INC, CLIC, CORP, DST, INC.
No comments:
Post a Comment