Thursday, January 3, 2019

Emergency Hate Crimes Provisions


JESUS CHRIST® INC®
To: The U.S. Supreme Court – O.I.G.
The Blue House Locale 462 –Order of ZEWS
Jones, DCZ, 20050

From: The Reverend Frank Paul Jones – The Messiah
923 S.A. Ave – Order of ZEWS – Locale 31
Avon Park, FL. 33825


3 December 2018

RE: The Hate Crimes against Jesus Christ Act & Request for Emergency Hate Crimes Provisions for members of a Protected Group.

I attest in sound mind and memory, with due diligence and without duress, I and my family have documented proof we are hate crimes victims. Each and every member of Jesus Christ, INC, under the file of Department of Justice File # 3704895, have been hated due to preconceived notions and that is based on prejudice and not anything we have done to those who have made our lives event of daily humiliation.

I was brutally beaten here in Augusta, GA by Federal Police, after my medical records was transferred to Augusta VAMC, due to hate crime in Highlands County by Dr. Doris Borden a fraudulent doctor. She has no license to practice medicine. It was on film and I still have the bone fragment in my chest due to the healing process taken place in Detention due to invalid accusers in each case. I spend most of the last year in detention and did not get convicted on any crime or was even accused of committing a crime. Now I and my family are in exile from the State of Florida with nowhere safe for us to be together as a Union. I need immediate help in housing, food, clothing, protection and mediation to remedy these hate crimes against me and my family. And under VHA I request what was already granted me, Choice health care due to the circumstance of continued hatred towards us at the VAMC and the fact that there is no VAMC within 45 miles radius of my home. And under VHA with buy in, I have both Medicare and Medicaid buy in at $650 and I AM a War Veteran served in USAEUAR and the war ended the day I stepped food in Germany 1 Jan 1977.

Since 2009, I have been Baker Act over 40 to 50 times without reason and have been diagnosed as a Martha Mitchell Effect Victim.

The Martha Mitchell effect is the process by which a psychiatrist, psychologist, or other mental health clinician labels the patient's accurate perception of real events as delusional and misdiagnoses accordingly.

According to Bell et al., "Sometimes, improbable reports are erroneously assumed to be symptoms of mental illness", due to a "failure or inability to verify whether the events have actually taken place, no matter how improbable intuitively they might appear to the busy clinician".[1] They note that typical examples of such situations may include:
Quoting psychotherapist Joseph Berke, the authors note that "even paranoids have enemies". Any patient, they explain, can be misdiagnosed by clinicians, especially patients with a history of paranoid delusions.
Of note is how habitually patients are diagnosed as delusional when their grievances concern health care workers and/or health care institutions, even when the patient has no history of delusion. "A patient arriving claiming to have been injured by another health care professional is regarded as a crazy person who potentially could ruin the career of an innocent colleague."[2]


Cases

State of Florida v. Frank Paul Jones (2016)
State of Georgia v. Frank Paul Jones (2017)
City of New York v. Frank Paul Jones (2017
Chaka Mosi Kamanu Zulu v. Egan (2003)
State of Florida v. Izzy Rodriquez Jones (2016) whose name is Izzy Jones and DNA proved angels Exist on earth today. This case expanded into a Interstate FBI probe of child abductions.

Citations:

A hate crime (also known as a bias-motivated crime or bias crime) is a prejudice-motivated crime which occurs when a perpetrator targets a victim because of his or her membership (or perceived membership) in a certain social group or race.

The Violent Crime Control and Law Enforcement Act, enacted in 28 U.S.C. § 994 note Sec. 280003, requires the United States Sentencing Commission to increase the penalties for hate crimes committed on the basis of the actual or perceived race, color, religion, national origin, ethnicity, or gender of any person.

18 U.S. Code § 249 - Hate crime acts

(a) In General.—
(1)Offenses involving actual or perceived race, color, religion, or national origin.—Whoever, whether or not acting under color of law, willfully causes bodily injury to any person or, through the use of fire, a firearm, a dangerous weapon, or an explosive or incendiary device, attempts to cause bodily injury to any person, because of the actual or perceived race, color, religion, or national origin of any person—
(A)
shall be imprisoned not more than 10 years, fined in accordance with this title, or both; and
(B) shall be imprisoned for any term of years or for life, fined in accordance with this title, or both, if—
(i)
death results from the offense; or
(ii)
the offense includes kidnapping or an attempt to kidnap, aggravated sexual abuse or an attempt to commit aggravated sexual abuse, or an attempt to kill.
(2) Offenses involving actual or perceived religion, national origin, gender, sexual orientation, gender identity, or disability.—
(A)In general.—Whoever, whether or not acting under color of law, in any circumstance described in subparagraph (B) or paragraph (3), willfully causes bodily injury to any person or, through the use of fire, a firearm, a dangerous weapon, or an explosive or incendiary device, attempts to cause bodily injury to any person, because of the actual or perceived religion, national origin, gender, sexual orientation, gender identity, or disability of any person—
(i)
shall be imprisoned not more than 10 years, fined in accordance with this title, or both; and
(ii) shall be imprisoned for any term of years or for life, fined in accordance with this title, or both, if—
(I)
death results from the offense; or
(II)
the offense includes kidnapping or an attempt to kidnap, aggravated sexual abuse or an attempt to commit aggravated sexual abuse, or an attempt to kill.
(B)Circumstances described.—For purposes of subparagraph (A), the circumstances described in this subparagraph are that—
(i) the conduct described in subparagraph (A) occurs during the course of, or as the result of, the travel of the defendant or the victim—
(I)
across a State line or national border; or
(II)
using a channel, facility, or instrumentality of interstate or foreign commerce;
(ii)
the defendant uses a channel, facility, or instrumentality of interstate or foreign commerce in connection with the conduct described in subparagraph (A);
(iii)
in connection with the conduct described in subparagraph (A), the defendant employs a firearm, dangerous weapon, explosive or incendiary device, or other weapon that has traveled in interstate or foreign commerce; or
(iv) the conduct described in subparagraph (A)—
(I)
interferes with commercial or other economic activity in which the victim is engaged at the time of the conduct; or
(II)
otherwise affects interstate or foreign commerce.
(3)Offenses occurring in the special maritime or territorial jurisdiction of the united states.—
Whoever, within the special maritime or territorial jurisdiction of the United States, engages in conduct described in paragraph (1) or in paragraph (2)(A) (without regard to whether that conduct occurred in a circumstance described in paragraph (2)(B)) shall be subject to the same penalties as prescribed in those paragraphs.
(4)Guidelines.—
All prosecutions conducted by the United States under this section shall be undertaken pursuant to guidelines issued by the Attorney General, or the designee of the Attorney General, to be included in the United States Attorneys’ Manual that shall establish neutral and objective criteria for determining whether a crime was committed because of the actual or perceived status of any person.
(b) Certification Requirement.—
(1)In general.—No prosecution of any offense described in this subsection may be undertaken by the United States, except under the certification in writing of the Attorney General, or a designee, that—
(A)
the State does not have jurisdiction;
(B)
the State has requested that the Federal Government assume jurisdiction;
(C)
the verdict or sentence obtained pursuant to State charges left demonstratively unvindicated the Federal interest in eradicating bias-motivated violence; or
(D)
a prosecution by the United States is in the public interest and necessary to secure substantial justice.
(2)Rule of construction.—
Nothing in this subsection shall be construed to limit the authority of Federal officers, or a Federal grand jury, to investigate possible violations of this section.
(c)Definitions.—In this section—
(1)
the term “bodily injury” has the meaning given such term in section 1365(h)(4) of this title, but does not include solely emotional or psychological harm to the victim;
(2)
the term “explosive or incendiary device” has the meaning given such term in section 232 of this title;
(3)
the term “firearm” has the meaning given such term in section 921(a) of this title;
(4)
the term “gender identity” means actual or perceived gender-related characteristics; and
(5)
the term “State” includes the District of Columbia, Puerto Rico, and any other territory or possession of the United States.
(d) Statute of Limitations.—
(1)Offenses not resulting in death.—
Except as provided in paragraph (2), no person shall be prosecuted, tried, or punished for any offense under this section unless the indictment for such offense is found, or the information for such offense is instituted, not later than 7 years after the date on which the offense was committed.
(2)Death resulting offenses.—
An indictment or information alleging that an offense under this section resulted in death may be found or instituted at any time without limitation.
(Added and amended Pub. L. 111–84, div. E, §§ 4707(a), 4711, Oct. 28, 2009, 123 Stat. 2838, 2842.)
Amendments
2009—Subsec. (a)(4). Pub. L. 111–84, § 4711, added par. (4).
Severability
Pub. L. 111–84, div. E, § 4709, Oct. 28, 2009, 123 Stat. 2841, which related to severability of provisions, was editorially reclassified as section 30505 of Title 34, Crime Control and Law Enforcement.
Rule of Construction
Pub. L. 111–84, div. E, § 4710, Oct. 28, 2009, 123 Stat. 2841, which related to construction, was editorially reclassified as section 30506 of Title 34, Crime Control and Law Enforcement.
Findings
Pub. L. 111–84, div. E, § 4702, Oct. 28, 2009, 123 Stat. 2835, which set out Congressional findings related to hate crimes, was editorially reclassified as section 30501 of Title 34, Crime Control and Law Enforcement.




______________________________________
Rev. Frank Paul Jones – The Messiah





No comments:

Post a Comment