NASA
Top
Secret to Above Top Secret
Welcome
to Solar Ship one
Journey
around the Universe at 45,000
miles per hour cruising speed
In
220 million years'
Distance
equals – 45,000 X 24 x 365 ¼ x
220 million = you do the math. The
projected size of the Universe with the expectation of growth.
Wherefore every solar will expand or is of continuum growth nature.
Apollo
13 – Fact one must be of Spirit nature to exit the third vector.
The
first primate astronaut was Albert, a rhesus
macaque,
who on June 11, 1948, rode to over 63 km (39 mi) on a V-2
rocket.
Albert died of suffocation during the flight.[1][2][3]
Albert
was followed by Albert II who survived the V-2 flight but died on
impact on June 14, 1949, after a parachute failure.[2] Albert
II became the first monkey and the first primate in space as his
flight reached 134 km (83 mi) - past the Kármán
line of
100 km taken to designate the beginning of space.[4] Albert
III died at 35,000 feet (10.7 km) in an explosion of his V2 on
September 16, 1949. Albert IV, on the last monkey V-2 flight, died on
impact on December 8 that year after another parachute
failure.[2] His
flight reached 130.6 km.
Alberts, I, II, and IV were rhesus macaque while Albert III was
a Crab-eating
macaque.
NASA YouTube File # - Apollo 13 Re-entry (1970) – happened in 1969
Renamed
Jesus Christ 1 = Apollo 13
During
Apollo 13 – I and RFK and JFK and Neil Armstrong was not in the
Capsule of Apollo 13. Neil was not Spirit at the Time and did not
leave the third vector. I went to the moon and JFK and RFK went
around the earth and came back. Sort Boomeranged. The team had to
come back together because my capsule was required for reentry into
the earth atmosphere. Those two were raised and now Neil Armstrong
too is Spirit, h has been raised to Spirit and is a Maj. Gen,
wherefore, NASA is Private nonprofit, N.A.S.A .is linked to Central
Command
Vaporized Electrical Conduction Ignition and take off
Mars
by 2025
NASA
Research
Statistics for the Sun |
||
Diameter
Surface
Temperature
Interior
Temperature
Rotational
Period
Estimated
Age
Primary
Chemical Component
Apparent
Magnitude
|
......
......
......
......
......
......
......
|
863,400
miles (1,390,000 km)
10,800°
F (6,000° C)
27,000,000°
F (15,000,000° C)
25-36
days
4.5
billion years
Hydrogen
-26.8
|
Entry into Other Solar Systems
The
falling angel theory is reality. If you place a negative charge in a
sector, it will attracted to the positive magnetic field.
Note:
The pit is at the South End as in South Pole
Entry
to the south will result in the capsule burning up, nobody ever been
to the South Pole.
Entry
into Solar System of planetary system
Quick rundown: Solar system and Universe beyond
Entry
into another Solar system has to be toward the North and not the
South and the science of the magnetic force is simplistic The Falling
Angel Theory term theory as a matter of accuracy.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1y3ClNyPRlg
The Gravity on Other Planets | Astronomic
Exiting
out of a Solar System of planetary system
Trajectory
at 45 to 180 degrees in low Gravitation environment
Physics - Mechanics: Projectile Motion (1 of 4) Finding the Angle - Simple Case
Question
for Chief Medical Advisor: Will lowered gravitational Forces increase
Hyper loop Acceleration? –
Answer;
Give Equation.
Dr.
K. Jackson, MD. Chemistry, Digital Science
700 mph in a tube: The Hyperloop experience
Hyperloop Explained | the B1M
Vaporized
Gold Electrical Conductions Ignition
- Gold can be vaporized and is the best conductor know to Humankind
- As a conductor gold is a carrier and not the energy source.
- The energy will burn but the gold can be made solid or vaporized.
- Not a theory – Used properly Gold Vaporized will support high power ignition or explosions.
- Using Vacuum tube transport technology properly timed, will not only cause high power combustion but also can cause – acceleration through a vacuum tube angle at 45 to 180 degrees towards the atmosphere?
"NASA" - THORIUM REMIX 2016
Thorium
is an abundant material which can be transformed into massive
quantities of energy. To do so efficiently, requires a very different
nuclear reactor than the kind we use today- Not one that uses solid
fuel rods, but a reactor in which the fuel is kept in a liquid state.
Not one that uses pressurized water as a coolant, but a reactor that
uses chemically stable molten salts. Such a reactor is called a
"Molten Salt Reactor". Many different configurations are
possible. Some of these configurations can harness Thorium very
efficiently. If you have ever heard the word THORIUM before now, that
is because NASA paid $10,000 to have MSR research documents scanned.
NASA needs power for space missions, but current nuclear reactors are
ill-suited for off-world application. This video explores the
attributes of Molten Salt Reactors. Why are they compelling? And why
do many people (including myself) see them as the only economical way
of fully harnessing ALL our nuclear fuels... including Thorium.
THORIUM REMIX 2016 has been under development since 2012. I hope it
conveys to you why I personally find Molten Salt Reactors so
compelling, as do the many volunteers and supporters who helped
create this video. Much of the footage was shot by volunteers.
Entities pursuing Molten Salt Reactors are...
Flibe
Energy –
http://flibe-energy.com/
Terrestrial Energy –
http://terrestrialenergy.com/
Moltex Energy –
http://www.moltexenergy.com/
ThorCon Power –
http://thorconpower.com/
Transatomic –
http://www.transatomicpower.com/
Seaborg –
http://seaborg.co/
Copenhagen Atomics –
http://www.copenhagenatomics.com/
TerraPower –
http://www.barc.gov.in/
Chinese Academy of Sciences –
http://english.cas.cn/
Regular Thorium conferences are organized by:
http://thoriumenergyworld.com/
Some of this footage is remixed from non-MSR related sources, to help
explain the importance of energy for both space exploration and
everyday life here on Earth. Most prominently... Pandora's Promise –
https://youtu.be/bDw3ET3zqxk
Dr. Neil DeGrasse Tyson –
https://youtu.be/Pun76NZMjCk
Stephen Colbert -
https://youtu.be/6jXazEYi3P8
Dr. Robert Zubrin -
https://youtu.be/EKQSijn9FBs
Mars Underground -
https://youtu.be/tcTZvNLL0-w
Andy Weir & Adam Savage –
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCtES...
...to see when & where ALL remix components have been used, watch
this video using a computer and enable "YouTube Annotations".
Citations will appear on-screen during playback. All music was
created by:
Category
istances:
Space Travel:
When
I started with this hobby I was fascinated by the vastness of the
distances involved, and I guess that I still am. I have
taken pictures of all of the objects discussed below which are all
the way out and beyond 2 Billion Light Years from the end of my
driveway and beyond 3 Billion from my observatory in New Mexico. If
I can see that far, can I get there?
Consider
the distance from New York to Frankfurt , Germany . This
one-way flight takes about 8 hours travel time. This is
traveling on a 747 airplane at around 550 miles per hour. The
way to think about distance is how much time it would take to get
from point A to point B?
Since
we have already been to the moon (at least some of us) we know that
we have a faster way to travel than a 747. The average
speed to make this trip was about 5,000 miles per hour (10x that of
the 747)
| Distance (one-way) | 747 travel time | Saturn V Rocket | |
| Moon | 240 Thousand Miles | 18 days | 2 days |
With
today’s technology travel time by space ship we can easily get to
an average speed of 15,000 miles per (30x that of the 747). The most
recent rocket to Jupiter for example (Juno Mission launched in 2011
with an Atlas 5 launch vehicle, and with a sling-shot speed boost
from Earth) will travel at 300x the speed of a 747 or about 165,000
miles per hour. This is the fastest man-made object in history.
| Mercury | 56 Million Miles | I don’t want to go there it is too hot. |
| Venus | 26 Million Miles |
While
this is too hot also, it is our closest neighbor:
72
Days |
| Mars | 48 Million Miles | 133 Days or so… these are just rough numbers, the planets do not stand still and the distance relative to earth varies significantly. I understand that the NASA estimate is a 9 month journey, one-way. |
| Jupiter | 400 Million Miles | Why go to a place where you cannot stand and that may have no real surface? |
| Saturn | 800 Million Miles |
Why
go to a place where you cannot stand… sight seeing of course,
the rings are pretty:
6
Years. |
| Uranus | 1.7 Billion Miles | Why go to a place where you cannot stand and that may have no real surface? |
| Neptune | 2.7 Billion Miles | Why go to a place where you cannot stand and that may have no real surface? |
| Pluto | 3.5 Billion Miles | 9 Years, but you might have to jump off the rocket as it fly's on past Pluto. |
| ? |
What
does this mean? Mars yes, and maybe someday Venus. Human
beings will definitely land on Mars in this century. But
for the rest of the planets themselves, there would be no purpose for
human travel. For the planets other than Mars our machines
would have to do the work. We will someday probably find
some of the moons around Jupiter and Saturn to be worth the
trip. And if this is interesting enough then there may be
other interesting moons around the more distant gas giants. But
if Pluto is too far to go, how will humans ever explore beyond our
Solar System? There can only be a couple of possible
answers either travel much faster, or invent some other exotic method
(worm holes, bending space, etc). And as for
extra-terrestrials, if we cannot get there because of the laws of
physics, they probably cannot get here either.
Within
Our Galaxy (the Milky Way) [Nebula, Planetary
Nebula, Star
Clusters, Stars, Comets, Asteroids etc]
The
real problems just begin when we want to think about traveling to
other places within our own galaxy (to other planets outside our
solar systems for example). Instead of referring to
millions or billions of miles we must switch the scale and talk about
light years of distance. The distance that light travels
in one year (1 light year) is about 5.8 trillion miles. There
is just no way to even begin to get there from here. Let’s
assume that we could build a really fast rocket that goes 2,000x our
747-airplane and can average 1 Million Miles an hour. Using
this new rocket:
| To Alpha Centauri, the closest star to our sun. | 4.3 Light Years | 2,900 Years |
| To M3 a very large star cluster (we certainly could find other life forms there) | 32 Thousand Light Years | 21 Million Years |
| The far edge of the Milky Way | 60 Thousand Light Years | 41 Million Years |
It
is just not possible.
Thoughts
on Traveling to the stars: I
don't believe that we can send colonies of humans to the stars. In
such a journey the people might reproduce over generations as the
star-ship makes its way over time. Such a journey is too long and it
is simply too dangerous for human anatomy, in my opinion. But there
would be a way to package and preserve pre-harvested human eggs and
human sperm. Machines could be constructed to protect the cargo until
arrival then create human beings through in vitro fertilization.
Other machines would nurture, educate and grow the new infants in
orbit around some planet, New Earth. Humanity's children would be the
offspring of our technologies.
To
Other Galaxies
The
problems now just get out of hand and it is not even worth making
travel reservations. The Sombrero Galaxy (M104)
is a place that I would like to visit. It makes a great
picture after all. It is 64 Million Light Years away (we
have gone up from Thousands to Millions of Light Years). This
would multiply by 1,000 the number of years needed to travel even
using our 1 Million MPH rocket. That would take about
42,000,000,000 years. We started measuring our calendars
when; 2,000 BC years or so? So this trip would take
roughly 10,000,000 times longer than all of recorded human history on
a rocket that is so fast that we do not know how to think about
building it. (see an idea on speed-hitch-hiking).
What makes this all worse is these estimates assume a static,
non-expanding, universe. Of course the real universe is rapidly
expanding and the expansion is increasing. In some distant day, no
galaxies will even be visible through even the largest telescopes, so
trying to travel to a galaxy that is running away is just not going
to happen. In fact just going fast and faster is not really going to
work either without some very exotic physics.
| Andromeda, the closest major galaxy to us | 2.3 Million Light Years | 1.5 Billion Years |
| M104 Sombrero galaxy | 64 Million Light Years | 42 Billion Years |
Pretty
pictures, but you just can’t get there from here. We are
talking only 3
Billion Light Years for
the objects that I can see in my telescope. Hubble can see
over 13 Billion Light Years. Until we can find a place or
circumstance where the formula (Distance=Speed*Time) is no longer
valid, it is just not doable. I think that I will remove
ET from my list of things to worry about.
Traveling
at the speed of light: If
we are able to increase the speed of travel, of course we can reduce
the excessive time required for interstellar space travel. There is
at less some new theoretical work being developed in this area, and I
refer you to the following
article: http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/31665236/ns/technology_and_science-innovation/ I
believe that the mass of any object approaching the speed of light is
supposed to approach infinity. This would not be good, and it is
still hard for me to fully get behind this idea of light speed space
travel.
Just
a side thought: I
can photograph at roughly 3/13th (23%)
of the distance of the Hubble Space Telescope, yet I spent an amount
which is insignificant in comparison to the money spent on the
Hubble. Funding for those last Light Years is certainly
expensive.
October
12, 2005
Updated:
July 08, 2009
Updated:
Oct 10, 2013
Updated:
July 30, 2017
No comments:
Post a Comment